uhhhhhh so I take it you didn’t read any of the other comments in this thread then?

The thread is old, but I’m sure I read 90% of it at the time. Regardless, I’m familiar with the tone of AmRen comments. I agree with some, and not with others.

and not sure who the “we” is referring to when you say “we recognize.”

Um. Okay, would you like to list a culture – ANY culture – prior to 1960 which you would consider both “civilized” and not racist?

If you consider NOTHING but the Western world post-1965 “civilized,” you are going to have to justify that.

Alternative viewpoint hahahaha wow yes, that’s a good pc spin.

Well, that’s precisely what it is. Actually, I should have said viewPOINTS, because there’s no one monolithic opinion here on race relations or how we should all live.

The knee-jerk characterization of sites like this as [whatever you want to call it – “neo-Nazi,” “white supremacist,” etc.] ALSO silences more moderate dialogue that even the likes of liberals ought to consider valuable.

Prof. Carol Swain has expressed the concern that it is folly to write off white nationalists without consideration, because the movement has grown out of racial tensions that are not being fully addressed in Western society. It fell on deaf ears, of course, with her being called, “an apologist for white supremacists,” even though she clearly disagrees strongly with white nationalism.

People like you are essentially doing the same thing as the people who attacked Prof. Swain without listening to what she was saying.