It would delight me to debate you more often, because you have interesting and also though-provoking views. I do not mind hearing opposing views and the arguments for them, because all I want is to have or acquire a rational worldview. If I am an honest truth-seeker, I do not fear any views or arguments.

the correct analogy would be people love money or beauty, but when they have none, they hate and envy those who do.

I have thought about this analogy for some time. The issues of your first and second paragraphs are hate and envy. You claim that WWII history is proof of your claim that people tend to be jealous haters for different reasons, such as money and beauty. Claiming that WWII history is proof for anything is such a huge claim that I have to ask you this question: Could you name any examples to back up and explain your claim?

I will not further discuss your claim about WWII history, because I foresee that while you might know examples from the top of your head to back up and explain your claim, it would waste too much of my time to investigate such a huge claim myself. It is only your duty, not mine, to back up and explain your claim. You have the burden of proof when you make a claim. Currently, your claim seems unfalsifiable to me because I do not yet know enough about it. When you have provided me with more information, your claim might turn out to be falsifiable. You know now what needs to be done.

Leaving the above question about your claim about WWII history up to you, I will however focus on your claim that people are jealous haters, because you have provided me with enough information to make an accurate assessment of that claim.

Although you claim that I underestimate your claim about people, it has to be proven that your claim about people is true for Europeans, esp. Germans. The question is: Do they tend to be jealous haters? Or what else do they tend to be?

Your analogy seems to indicate that you basically claim that the main reason for hate and jealousy is lack, e.g. of money and beauty. Also you seem to assume that a large-scale eugenic project for the increase of Nordics in Germany will lead to lack among non-Nordics.

We could take a look at Spartan society. Spartan boys were not given enough food, so that they would have to steal from Spartan slaves. Spartan boys lacked food. Did they therefore hate or envy Spartan slaves? Or what else motivated them to steal?

If your claim is true, then Hinduism is proof that this can be cured through indoctrination, because Hindu teachings successfully cause people to accept their fate, no matter how miserable it is. If your claim is not always true, then how can lack lead to hate and jealousy? Gossip might be the main channel through which lack might lead to hate and jealousy.

Gossip is propaganda, esp. by those who lack for those who lack. Therefore the only way to intercept this is counterpropaganda. Propaganda is a means to an end. Therefore it is like any normal tool that a farmer might use to work the land. Propaganda is used to either indoctrinate or teach people. If people want to indoctrinate or teach, there must be a motive.

Now it is time to return to your unstated assumption that a large-scale eugenic project for the increase of Nordics in Germany will lead to lack among non-Nordics. I have to say that this is not necessarily true, because one might seek a balance between what one gives and does not give to Nordics and non-Nordics. Endeavouring to increase the number of Nordics through a large-scale eugenic project and endeavouring to satisfy both Nordics and non-Nordics are not mutually exclusive.

If your claim about people is true, it will have effect on the preferred course of action but it will have no effect on the question whether a large-scale eugenic project for the increase of Nordics in Germany is feasible. Your claim about people seems to have caused you to assume that such a project is not feasible. The reason or argument for that unstated assumption is mistaken for the reasons that I have pointed out above.

Returning to your claim about people, how can a balance be made between gifts that are bestowed upon Nordics and non-Nordics? Although experts will work to increase the fertility rate of Nordics by every possible means, experts might also work to create special legal, social and economic advantages for non-Nordics over Nordics.

Although non-Nordics have their needs not much unlike Nordics, Nordics are the victims here because their numbers have been systematically depleted through intermarriage with non-Nordics for a very long time and without any project to save Nordics it is not going to take very long until Nordics will be a fading memory in the minds of those who belong to Homo sapiens or the White race.

Even though BBC and Sunday Times falsely reported between 2002 and 2006 that a scientific study had estimated that natural blondes would become extinct by 2202 (see Wikipedia article Disappearing blonde gene), Nordics will really be no more in a few centuries like Whites if current trends of intermarriage and low fertility rate continue. This is a life of death struggle of myself and people like myself.

The tide has to be turned, and this time the odds have to be with us, or else people like myself will be no more. Our death would be eternal and the likes of myself would never walk the earth again. Reality is worse than our worst nightmare, but those who accept reality will be more prepared to face the challenges of survival on this planet than those who are with their minds in loony fairytale land.

Instead of welfare to non-Whites and foreign aid to Black Africa, every Nordic family should receive a reward for every Nordic child that is born. That reward should increase relative to the amount of Nordic children that the family already has. An extra reward for highly desirable traits, such as high IQ and high self-control, might not be out of place.

Here is an illustrative but fictional example of the not yet fully developed idea that is mentioned in the previous paragraph:

1st child: 5K

2nd child: 10K

3rd child: 15K

4th child: 20K

5th child: 20K + free rent

6th child: 25K

7th child: 30K

8th child: 35K

9th child: 40K

10th child: 40K + free food

Returning again to your claim about people, this article argues that being a liker or hater has to do with personality and genetics:

What the researchers found was that there was certainly lots of variation between what people liked and disliked. But, oddly, at a general level, people were split between likers and haters.

In other words, some people tended to like stuff even though they didn’t really know much about it, and some people had the tendency to hate stuff, whatever it was.

The authors of this article argue that this initial stance towards anything and everything is a facet of personality. In the same way that you can be either extroverted or introverted, you can also be a ‘liker’ or a ‘hater’.

So, the answer to why the haters have to hate is that it’s built into them at the level of their personality.

Now, how you might become a like[r] or a hater in the first place, we don’t yet know. Likely, it’s got a lot to do with genetics. Some people are born haters, others born likers. [Why Haters Have to Hate, Psyblog]

I know another article which says that studies show that personality is genetically determined:

Nature rather than nurture is responsible for creating your personality, according to a study of twins which found that character is something you are born with.

[…..]

Genes play a greater role in determining key personality traits like social skills and learning ability than the way we are brought up by our parents, researchers claimed.

Researchers from Edinburgh University studied more than 800 sets of identical and non-identical twins to learn whether genetics or upbringing has a greater effect on how successful people are in life.

[…..]

Writing in the Journal of Personality, the researchers found that identical twins were twice as likely as non-identical twins to share the same personality traits, suggesting that their DNA was having the greatest impact. [It’s nature, not nurture: personality lies in genes, twins study shows, The Telegraph]

Now I will consider the most important question: Are Whites jealous haters?

1. Remember, Whites are the same race which is very willing to collectively lower its own birthrate to a suicidal level for the sake of the planet and environment.

2. Remember, Whites are the same race which cares the most about the protection of wild life and is willing to donate its fairly earned money to that “noble cause.”

3. Remember, Whites are the same race which is very willing to pay for the welfare of a high % of the dysfunctional minority population.

4. Remember, Whites are the same race which has donated one trillion dollars over the past sixty years to foreign aid to poor, dysfunctional Black Africa.

5. Remember, Whites are the same race which is resolutely willing to commit collective suicide on the ground of its own morals.

Whites are resolutely willing to commit collective suicide for the strangest, supposedly altruistic reasons, so I rather see a race of suicidal altruists than a race of jealous haters! Islam might teach that people are jealous haters, because it is a religion that originates in the Middle East. Whites are not Arabs. Therefore do not attribute Arab traits to Whites.