Matthew Heimbach did a fine job in this interview — with the liberal media stacking the odds against him, of course — and should be congratulated on this appearance. Over 170 comments so far, with dozens just about Russians and Sicilians; yet nothing about this brave young white advocate making his case for the TV cameras.

Mr. Heimbach was very, as they say, “mediagenic”: he smiled, he held eye contact, he spoke clearly and calmly and factually… all while saying the unsayable. All while using the word “white” as a positive and not a negative. All while advocating a return to pre-1964 CRA social arrangements. This young man seems to be a student of the Jared Taylor School of Public Speaking.

My only advice to him for future interviews would be to be more on guard for the way the host will spin your every utterance. Hartman is a lot more practiced at this sort of thing — plus of course he has the advantage of being the one to claim all those “moral” things everybody is “supposed” to believe about “equality” and “brotherhood” — and a white advocate such as Mr. Heimbach needs to be careful not to let their interrogator corner them via some cheap rhetorical device or other verbal ju-jitsu. As host, Tom Hartman is free to jump from topic to topic willy-nilly, and he does with great gusto; as guest, Matt Heimbach is forced to follow the host’s lead without walking into one of several possible traps. Another unfair advantage for the MSM, but one which Heimbach for the most part effectively neutralized.

Also keep in mind that TV hosts like these, being media creatures, are at heart Narcissists. As strong as their devotion to liberal pieties may be, as someone who has spent some time around them I can assure you that what is even stronger is their devotion to their own wonderfulness. Note how much camera time is given to Hartman: in the middle of the clip he hijacks the debate for a long tirade. This is due to egotism as much as to ideology. But for the final two (of six) minutes of this segment, the guest is finally given some chance to elaborate on his ideas — which is the best portion of the whole segment.

Well done, Mr. Heimbach. Onwards and upwards.